Prompt-triggered source sets
Which prompts pull owned pages, competitor pages, review sites, directories, forums, articles or mixed source sets.
Retrieval Pattern Analysis
The Enough Agency analyzes the retrieval patterns behind AI answers — which prompts trigger which sources, why competitors are cited, how engines summarize evidence, where your pages are skipped, and what content, entity, schema, PR and citation changes can shift source selection across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
Bring your priority prompts, competitor set, key pages, source gaps, current citations and AI visibility questions. We identify which retrieval patterns are helping or blocking your brand.
Why Retrieval Patterns Matter
Two brands can publish similar content and get very different AI visibility. The difference often sits in the retrieval pattern: which source type the engine prefers, which competitor page it trusts, which review surface it leans on, and which owned page is too vague, thin or poorly structured to be extracted.
The Enough Agency studies the answer construction itself. We compare engines, prompts, source sets, citations and competitor evidence, then show what needs to change so your brand becomes easier to retrieve, verify, cite and recommend.
What We Analyze
Which prompts pull owned pages, competitor pages, review sites, directories, forums, articles or mixed source sets.
How ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot and AI Overviews differ in source usage, citation display and summary style.
The source formats, claims, proof and authority signals that make competitors appear where your brand does not.
Pages that contain useful information but are not structured clearly enough for direct answer extraction or citation.
Where the engine finds the brand but misreads the category, offer, geography, proof, people or product relationship.
Whether source inclusion correlates with branded search, AI referrals, assisted conversions or sales feedback.
Analysis Method
Run fixed buyer prompts repeatedly across engines and capture answers, citations, source sets, competitors and answer positions.
Group source types, answer formats, citation patterns, entity signals, competitor mentions and missing-brand prompts.
Identify why the brand is skipped, weakly summarized, uncited or outranked by a competitor in the answer construction.
Prioritize the content, source, schema, entity, PR and internal-linking changes most likely to influence the next cycles.
Outputs
A prompt-by-prompt map showing which sources are selected, how answers are assembled and where your brand enters or disappears.
Evidence of which competitor pages, mentions, review profiles, articles and directories are being used in AI answers.
A practical readout of how each engine retrieves, summarizes, cites and frames sources in your category.
Owned pages scored for answer-first structure, schema clarity, entity consistency, citation-readiness and missing proof.
Specific recommendations for pages to restructure, claims to support, sources to earn, schema to add and prompts to re-test.
Tracking for retrieval rate, citation share, source diversity, recommendation share, answer position, sentiment and business signals.